|
History of
Tibet
China is a unified country with 56 nationalities. As a major
member of this big family, the Tibetans are found in large
numbers throughout the Tibet Autonomous Region, most parts
of Qinghai Province, southern Gansu Province, northwest Sichuan
Province and northwest Yunnan Province.
At the time of the unification of the Tibetan race, its various
tribes maintained close ties with the Han and several other
nationalities in western and northwestern China. During the
first part of the 7th century, Tubo King Songtsan Gambo unified
the various Tibetan tribes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and
formed the Tubo Kingdom, which later maintained frequent contact
with the Central Government of the Tang Dynasty (618-907).
The marriages of Songtsan Gambo to Princess Wen Cheng and
Tride Zhotsan to Princess Jin Cheng indicate that the Tibetan
and the Han nationalities had gradually formed close political,
economic and cultural ties. In the mid-9th century, the unified
Tubo Kingdom collapsed. This was followed by the rise of many
local warring factions in the Tibetan areas of the Qinghai-Tibet
Plateau. When the Song Dynasty (960-1279) was founded in the
Han-dominated areas of China, some of these local Tibetan
forces (Tibetan tribes formerly subject to rule by the Tubo
Kingdom) pledged allegiance to the Song court. The relations
between the Tibetans and the Han became even closer during
this period.
When the Mongolians founded the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368),
a dynasty that featured unprecedented national unity, Tibet
was officially incorporated into the Chinese nation. Kublai
Khan, the founding emperor of the Yuan Dynasty, granted the
Sagya regime the power to administer Tibet under the rule
of the Yuan government, and introduced many rules and regulations
to be applied to Tibet. The Mongolian, Han, Tibetan and various
other nationalities joined hands to form a political entity
featuring economic and cultural prosperity. The Ming Dynasty
(1368-1644) basically followed various systems introduced
during the Yuan Dynasty for rule over Tibet. In carrying out
a policy of pacification, the Ming Dynasty granted the title"Prince
of Dharma" or"Prince" to eight government and religious leaders
in the Tibetan areas. During this period of time, the Tibetan
areas and the Central Plains maintained frequent economic
and cultural exchanges; the relations between the Tibetan
race and the other nationalities in the Chinese family developed
further. After the 17th century, the Manchurians unified China
and founded the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911). The Qing government
granted the honorary title"Dalai Lama" to the Dalai and the
honorary title"Panchen Erdeni" to the Panchen; it also appointed
local government officials, dispatched high commissioners
to Tibet, and enacted laws concerning the Tibetan government
system and regulations for the more effective governing of
Tibet. This helped strengthen Qing government administration
over Tibet and led to closer ties between Tibet and the motherland.
In the 19th century, when the Qing entered its late period,
the British coupled its invasion of China's coastal areas
with an invasion of Tibet. The British sowed bad blood between
the Tibetan and the Han and other nationalities. The Qing
court, corrupt and impotent as it was, adopted many domestic
and foreign policies that proved the undoing of the Qing Dynasty.
The relations between the Tibetan local government and the
Central Government worsened. Nonetheless, no change took place
to the Chinese nation, the unified political entity composed
of the Han, Manchurian, Mongolian, Hui, Tibetan and various
other nationalities. Soldiers and civilians of the Han and
the Tibetan, Manchurian and Mongolian ethnic groups jointly
fought against imperialist invasions, writing a brilliant
page in the history of defending the motherland. In the late
years of the Qing and the early days of the Republic of China
(1912-49), the British left no stone unturned in their attempts
to cultivate pro-British elements in the upper echelon of
the ruling class in Tibet, and masterminded the Simla Conference
aimed at tearing Tibet away from the motherland. All these
failed to become true in the face of a boycott staged by the
patriotic forces in Tibet and the resolute opposition of people
throughout China. During this period, Tibet maintained ties
with the central government of China. China continued to exercise
sovereignty over Tibet, as it had since the Yuan Dynasty.
In 1949, the liberation struggle waged by the Chinese people
under the leadership of the Communist Party of China (CPC)
was crowned with a sweeping victory. At the time of the founding
of the People'sRepublic of China (PRC) in 1949, foreign imperialist
and expansionist forces incited Tibetan separatists to speed
up efforts towards bringing about"Tibetan independence" in
an attempt to make impossible the liberation of Tibet. The
CPC Central Committee and Chairman Mao Zedong decided to send
the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) into Tibet"early
rather than late," and worked out principles and policies
for the peaceful liberation of Tibet. The PLA troops and working
team members, sent into Tibet, followed the principles and
policies of the CPC Central Committee and Chairman Mao Zedong
to the letter and with great success. Tibet was peacefully
liberated in 1951. Foreign imperialist and expansionist forces,
who had been riding roughshod over the Tibetan people for
more than half a century, were driven out of Tibet. The Central
People'sgovernment followed a new policy for minority affairs.
Various ethnic groups in Tibet began, for the first time in
history, to enjoy political, economic, and social equality.
The big Chinese family, composed of Tibetans and members of
other nationalities, was formed on the principle of equality,
unity, fraternity and cooperation. Following the revolution
in Tibet, characterized by the overthrow of feudal serfdom
and the emancipation of the serfs and slaves and their becoming
masters of their own fate, Tibet enjoyed rapid development
in the political, economic and cultural fields. Tibet became
an autonomous region established in the People'sRepublic of
China in 1965. Although Tibet also experienced the chaotic"cultural
revolution" (1966-76) and mistakes were made, progress made
in construction has outstripped these setbacks. Tibet experienced
unprecedented development of the productive forces and improvements
in living standards. All the 56 nationalities in the big Chinese
family, Tibetans included, have cemented a politically, economically
and culturally united entity that no outside force can tear
apart.
This 1,000-year-long written history between the Tibetans
and various other nationalities in the big Chinese family
is an inalterable fact.
Marco Polo, an Italian who came to China and visited Emperor
Kublai Khan of the Yuan Dynasty in the 13th century, described
Tibet as"the Province of Tibet" in his travelogue. References
to Tibet as a province can be found in the editions of The
Travelogue of Marco Polo by the Macmillan Company in 1927
and also by the John Company of New York in 1948. Obviously,
Marco Polo stated in explicit term some 700 years ago that
Tibet was a province of China. In the 18th volume of The Encyclopedia
Britannica for 1973 and 1974, Webster's Atlas published in
the United States in 1978, and The International Atlas published
in the 1960s, maps are marked with China in larger letters
and Tibet in smaller letters. This is also the case with maps
published by various other countries. All these show that
these publications recognize Tibet as a part of China.
As an overwhelming majority of the Chinese are the Hans,
the word"Chinese" was used in English to mean both the Chinese
people and the Han people in specific. Although it is not
a rigorously followed approach to adopt the name of the majority
ethnic group of a nation as the reference for that nation,
other examples do exist in the world today. In India, for
example, the Indianstans make up more than 46 percent of the
Indian population, constituting the country's ethnic majority.
But the population also includes sizable numbers of Bengalis,
Tamils, and Sikhs. The term"Indian" has been used in English
to refer to all the various ethnic groups in India, not only
the Indianstan ethnic majority. (Strictly speaking, however,
the term should not encompass those from other ethnic groups)
In the United Kingdom, the English account for some 80 percent
of the national population. Other ethnic groups include the
Scots, Welsh, and Irish. In various countries around the world,
including the United Kingdom itself, the term"Englishmen"
or"Englander" is used to refer to members of all of the various
ethnic groups in the United Kingdom, not only the English,
but also the Scots, Welsh, and Irish. (Again, strictly speaking,
it does not include these peoples) Very few people in the
United Kingdom use the proper term"British" to refer to the
citizens of the United Kingdom, although it correctly means
the English, Scots, Welsh, and Irish and any other ethnic
minorities of the nation. This situation, which has been going
on for more than 1,000 years, is one of the major reasons
that many terms in English (and other languages as well) contain
meanings in both broad and narrow senses. For example,"Chinese"
means the"Chinese people" in a broad sense and the"Han people"
in a narrow sense, while"Englander" means the people of the
United Kingdom in a broad sense and the"Englander" in a narrow
sense.
Because of past confusion, the use of the term"Chinese" in
English translations can not correctly reflect the relations
between the various nationalities within the larger Chinese
family. Therefore, the Chinese government, after the founding
of New China, stipulated the use of"Han nationality,""Hans"
or"Han people." Such rigorous use of the English terms has
been accepted by foreign scholars holding just and rigorous
approaches. For example, the New Webster International English
Dictionary (third edition) published in 1961 cites the term"Han"
or"Hans," expounding it as: 1) the ethnic group that moved
from Central Asia to the Weishui River Valley in ancient times,
members of this ethnic group expanded eastward and southward
and resided in the bulk areas in eastern China, becoming the
primitive Chinese nation and forming the cultural mass that
holds predominance in China; 2) the people of the Han nationality.
In accordance with the international practice of names being
derived from their masters, terms used to mean a nationality,
a place and a people of that nationality -- written in the
country's own language and foreign languages---should be confirmed
by the government and peoples of that nation. Foreigners should
respect the stipulations of that country. Therefore, from
the angle of ethnicity, the Tibetans are not part of the Han
but from the angle of the Chinese population as a whole, the
Tibetans are undoubtedly part of the Chinese. This fairly
and accurately tells the historical reality that has existed
for more than 700 years, since the Yuan Dynasty.
www.tibet-china.org
|